
Blog
Jun 18, 2024
Introduction
The debate between passive and active investing isn’t new, yet it remains a hot topic. Passive strategies, like index fund investing, aim to match market returns with minimal fees, while active investing seeks to outperform through stock-picking or tactical asset allocation.
Pros and Cons
Passive Investing
Pros: Lower fees, less complexity, historical outperformance of many index benchmarks vs. active funds.
Cons: Zero chance of beating the market if the index underperforms.
Active Investing
Pros: Potential for higher returns if a skilled manager identifies undervalued assets.
Cons: Higher costs, greater risk of underperformance, requires deep research.
Supporting Data
Morningstar data shows that only 23% of active U.S. stock funds beat their passive counterparts over a 10-year span1.
How Surmount Wealth Does It Better
Surmount Wealth bridges the gap by offering hybrid approaches—blending passive index ETFs with opportunistic plays based on data analytics. It’s a balanced formula allowing both hands-off investors and those seeking strategic tilts to benefit from our platform’s insights.
Related
Category
Tax Alpha at Scale: How Automated Tax-Loss Harvesting Can Generate 100+ bps of Outperformance
Nov 7, 2025
Category
The AI Portfolio Management Revolution: What Works, What's Hype, and What RIAs Need to Know
Nov 5, 2025
Category
The Unbundling of Wealth Management: How Best-in-Class Tech Stacks Are Replacing All-in-One Platforms
Nov 3, 2025

Get Started
Experience the full power of our SaaS platform with a risk-free trial. Join countless businesses who have already transformed their operations. No credit card required.
FAQs







